The Newsom administration’s recent rollout of a new air conditioner mandate for California workplaces has sparked controversy, particularly regarding special carveouts for certain entities. Assembly Republican Leader James Gallagher expressed his concerns, stating, “California already has one of the most brutal business climates in the country. The last thing we need is another expensive regulation that will run companies out of the state. If this rule is too expensive for Newsom’s administration, what makes him think it’s OK to force it on businesses?”
Criticism of Governor Newsom’s approach to regulations is not new. Earlier this year, Newsom faced backlash for a peculiar exemption that allowed Panera Bread to bypass California’s $20 minimum wage law, benefiting a campaign donor and Panera franchisee, Greg Flynn. This incident, coupled with Newsom’s controversial attendance at a high-end dinner party during pandemic restrictions, has fueled perceptions of double standards.
The pattern of “Rules for thee and not for me” seems to persist in Governor Newsom’s decision-making, drawing scrutiny from various quarters. Gallagher’s remarks highlight growing concerns about preferential treatment and exemptions in policy implementations, raising questions about fairness and consistency in governance.
